| |
3m.
Relationship Between Ecological and Human Health Research
http://www-apps.niehs.nih.gov/sbrp/eag/web/3m.html
USEPA’s Superfund statutory authority mandates that it protect
both human and ecological health at hazardous waste sites. The protection
of human health has received more attention by the public, the USEPA,
and other federal and state site managers. However, recently increased
emphasis has been placed on the development of technologies and data
to better assess ecological health. Now, a risk assessment is prepared
for each site that includes separate assessments of human health and
the ecological impacts of a site.
The Program’s broad mandates enable its investigators to
conduct ecological research that is enhancing our ability to assess
or predict the damage that hazardous substances cause to ecosystems.
Multidisciplinary SBRP investigators are positioned to use the tools
and approaches developed for human studies and apply them to ecological
studies. In turn, not only are human studies used to advance ecological
studies, but the converse is also applicable. Understanding changes
at an ecological level can also be predictors of health effects
in humans.
Significant areas of study that need to be addressed include:
Conduct wildlife
impact studies that more fully assess complex ecological conditions
that can then be used to 1) develop remedial options that are protective
and cost-effective; and 2) assess whether the remedial action was
effective in reducing risk to ecological systems.\
Identify wildlife species that can be used as biomonitors of chemical
exposure and potentially apply them to human health risk assessments.
Conduct bioavailability studies in sentinel species, particularly
at large complex sites, such as contaminated sediment sites
Conduct food web studies to evaluate how toxic contaminants in water
and sediments travel through the food chain, which can impact entire
ecosystems and pose a potential human health threat.
|
|